The somewhat amorphous phrasing of "material non-call" seems to leave some room for things to go sideways, too. As Cuban initially noted, the last few minutes of the fourth quarter and overtime are merely the tip of the overall iceberg that is an NBA game as professional gambler and very smart Twitter person Haralabos Voulgaris noted, an awful lot of other stuff can happen in the earlier stages of games. seems like another solid step in that direction. Conducting regular post-mortems on the late stages of games - looking at the big decisions, what got called, what didn't get called, what should have happened, etc. The NBA has even considered more extreme steps, like introducing NFL-style coaches' challenges at the D-League level, in pursuit of more accurate calls and, perhaps even more importantly, a higher level of trust among NBA fans in the accuracy of officiating. Silver also expanded the number of triggers that could allow officials to initiate reviews, a decision that seemed to run counter to the league's desire to shorten game-length, but also appeared to be in lock step with the overarching interest in getting more stuff right. ![]() ![]() This season, the league introduced its expansive new replay review center, a 94-screen, 20-replay-station command center in Secaucus, N.J., directly connected to all 29 NBA arenas aimed at centralizing official reviews and speeding up the process of replay decisions. Later, during the Donald Sterling saga, Silver published the league's long-private constitution and bylaws, allowing everybody to take a look at the nuts and bolts of how the NBA's Board of Governors operates. The league began acknowledging missed calls before David Stern ceded the commissioner's chair to Adam Silver in February of 2014, but while those mea culpas have continued - for better or for worse - but the pace of the transparency push has quickened since Silver's succession.įirst, the NBA began distributing internal officiating memos to NBA teams then, the league opened those memos up to everybody. The publication of the "two minutes reports" represents the latest in a string of moves to increase transparency in officiating matters and the league at large. 19 win over the Sacramento Kings included a review of "12 plays in the final two minutes concluded officials made 11 correct calls and one incorrect call." Yahoo Sports NBA columnist Adrian Wojnarowski reported Friday that the National Basketball Referee's Association had "no involvement in the NBA's decision to make public.")Īccording to USA TODAY's Jeff Zillgitt, a sample report culled from the Portland Trail Blazers' Jan. (UPDATE: Apparently, the amount and nature of referee input are matters of some debate. "So I think this is a solution that puts them in a much better light, doesn't hide the fact that they are human and will make mistakes, but also points out the fact that the overwhelming majority of the calls that they get correct." ![]() "Our prior practice of commenting only about mistakes that they made was a bone for them, something we didn't feel that was fair to them and also something that they weren't happy about as well," Bantom said.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |